2025
El Sistema de Alertas mide el nivel de endeudamiento de los Entes Públicos que tengan contratados Financiamientos y Obligaciones, y éstos se encuentren inscritos en el Registro Público Único, cuya fuente o garantía de pago sea de Ingresos de libre disposición. La Ley de Disciplina Financiera de las Entidades Federativas y los Municipios (LDFEFM), establece tres indicadores para realizar la medición del Sistema de Alertas: (1) Deuda Pública y Obligaciones sobre Ingresos de libre disposición, (2) Servicio de la Deuda y de Obligaciones sobre Ingresos de libre disposición y (3) Obligaciones a Corto Plazo y Proveedores y Contratistas, menos los montos de efectivo, bancos e inversiones temporales, sobre Ingresos totales.
Las cifras utilizadas para el cálculo tomaron en consideración la información disponible en el Registro Público Único a cargo de la Secretaría, así como la información contable publicada por los Entes Públicos conforme a los formatos a que hace referencia la LDFEFM. La validez, veracidad y exactitud de la misma, es responsabilidad de las Entidades Federativas, Municipios y demás entes públicos.
Una explicación general de la metodología de medición del Sistema de Alertas se anexa en el siguiente documento. PDF
La medición del Sistema de Alertas es realizada tanto con información de Cuenta Pública, cuyo resultado es vinculante para la determinación del Techo de Financiamiento Neto: así como con las actualizaciones trimestrales o semestrales, las cuales tienen fines informativos y de seguimiento.
De acuerdo al resultado obtenido del Sistema de Alertas, el nivel de endeudamiento de los Entes Públicos se clasifica en tres niveles: 
Endeudamiento Sostenible; 
Endeudamiento en Observación; y 
Endeudamiento Elevado.
Para efectos de la determinación del Techo de Financiamiento Neto, de aquellos Entes Públicos que no tengan Financiamientos y Obligaciones inscritos en el Registro Público Único, podrán solicitar ser evaluados de manera voluntaria por el Sistema de Alertas, presentando la información requerida para la evaluación, de conformidad con el Reglamento del Sistema de Alertas.
En el caso del destino de los ingresos excedentes a que se refiere el artículo 14 de la LDFEFM, los Entes Públicos que no tengan un nivel de endeudamiento determinado por el Sistema de Alertas, por no tener Financiamientos y Obligaciones inscritos en el Registro Público Único, se clasificarán en un nivel de endeudamiento sostenible.
Entidad Federativa
Resultado del Sistema de Alertas
Indicador 1
Indicador 2
Indicador 3
Información entregada por la Entidad Federativa
| Aguascalientes | |
|
21.2% | |
3.5% | |
-2.5% | XLSX |
| Baja California | |
|
45.4% | |
5.7% | |
0.4% | XLSX |
| Baja California Sur | |
|
16.0% | |
3.3% | |
-10.9% | XLSX |
| Campeche | |
|
19.4% | |
3.0% | |
-25.1% | XLSX |
| Coahuila | |
|
100.1% | |
11.5% | |
-7.8% | XLSX |
| Colima | |
|
49.5% | |
6.7% | |
-2.7% | XLSX |
| Chiapas | |
|
39.4% | |
5.6% | |
-7.4% | XLSX |
| Chihuahua | |
|
88.5% | |
8.8% | |
-0.8% | XLSX |
| Ciudad de México | |
|
43.3% | |
6.3% | |
-26.7% | XLSX |
| Durango | |
|
54.6% | |
9.6% | |
5.1% | XLSX |
| Guanajuato | |
|
21.9% | |
4.7% | |
-16.6% | XLSX |
| Guerrero | |
|
14.3% | |
2.3% | |
7.5% | XLSX |
| Hidalgo | |
|
11.1% | |
2.8% | |
-18.4% | XLSX |
| Jalisco | |
|
30.0% | |
4.3% | |
-7.3% | XLSX |
| México | |
|
32.1% | |
4.2% | |
-6.9% | XLSX |
| Michoacán | |
|
52.5% | |
6.6% | |
-0.1% | XLSX |
| Morelos | |
|
39.1% | |
5.2% | |
-2.7% | XLSX |
| Nayarit | |
|
52.9% | |
8.1% | |
3.3% | XLSX |
| Nuevo León | |
|
94.7% | |
11.6% | |
4.6% | XLSX |
| Oaxaca | |
|
37.6% | |
5.7% | |
-6.9% | XLSX |
| Puebla | |
|
15.6% | |
2.9% | |
-10.6% | XLSX |
| Querétaro | |
|
6.5% | |
3.4% | |
-14.1% | XLSX |
| Quintana Roo | |
|
66.0% | |
7.9% | |
-11.9% | XLSX |
| San Luis Potosí | |
|
25.9% | |
3.1% | |
4.9% | XLSX |
| Sinaloa | |
|
18.2% | |
3.7% | |
1.7% | XLSX |
| Sonora | |
|
69.4% | |
10.1% | |
1.8% | XLSX |
| Tabasco | |
|
12.2% | |
2.6% | |
-3.5% | XLSX |
| Tamaulipas | |
|
42.8% | |
5.1% | |
-9.5% | XLSX |
| Veracruz | |
|
60.2% | |
7.3% | |
-11.9% | XLSX |
| Yucatán | |
|
40.3% | |
5.2% | |
-6.4% | XLSX |
| Zacatecas | |
|
43.5% | |
6.8% | |
-3.8% | XLSX |
Entidad Federativa
Resultado del Sistema de Alertas
Indicador 1
Indicador 2
Indicador 3
Información entregada por la Entidad Federativa
| Aguascalientes | |
|
20.0% | |
3.2% | |
-4.4% | XLSX |
| Baja California | |
|
41.1% | |
5.5% | |
-0.9% | XLSX |
| Baja California Sur | |
|
14.0% | |
3.2% | |
-13.3% | XLSX |
| Campeche | |
|
18.5% | |
2.8% | |
-27.4% | XLSX |
| Coahuila | |
|
94.9% | |
10.8% | |
-11.4% | XLSX |
| Colima | |
|
46.5% | |
6.1% | |
-5.0% | XLSX |
| Chiapas | |
|
38.9% | |
5.4% | |
-9.1% | XLSX |
| Chihuahua | |
|
88.7% | |
8.8% | |
-1.5% | XLSX |
| Ciudad de México | |
|
39.1% | |
5.7% | |
-29.3% | XLSX |
| Durango | |
|
52.6% | |
9.2% | |
0.6% | XLSX |
| Guanajuato | |
|
20.9% | |
4.6% | |
-16.4% | XLSX |
| Guerrero | |
|
9.7% | |
2.0% | |
5.1% | XLSX |
| Hidalgo | |
|
10.9% | |
2.6% | |
-22.1% | XLSX |
| Jalisco | |
|
29.2% | |
4.1% | |
-10.4% | XLSX |
| México | |
|
29.9% | |
3.8% | |
-8.8% | XLSX |
| Michoacán | |
|
50.8% | |
6.3% | |
-0.4% | XLSX |
| Morelos | |
|
36.7% | |
4.7% | |
-5.9% | XLSX |
| Nayarit | |
|
51.2% | |
7.3% | |
2.0% | XLSX |
| Nuevo León | |
|
100.0% | |
11.0% | |
2.4% | XLSX |
| Oaxaca | |
|
37.2% | |
5.3% | |
-9.5% | XLSX |
| Puebla | |
|
15.3% | |
3.0% | |
-13.9% | XLSX |
| Querétaro | |
|
6.3% | |
3.8% | |
-17.0% | XLSX |
| Quintana Roo | |
|
64.4% | |
7.4% | |
-13.0% | XLSX |
| San Luis Potosí | |
|
24.6% | |
3.0% | |
2.3% | XLSX |
| Sinaloa | |
|
19.1% | |
3.4% | |
0.1% | XLSX |
| Sonora | |
|
68.2% | |
9.0% | |
1.1% | XLSX |
| Tabasco | |
|
12.5% | |
2.6% | |
-2.6% | XLSX |
| Tamaulipas | |
|
40.7% | |
4.6% | |
-12.5% | XLSX |
| Veracruz | |
|
55.6% | |
6.5% | |
-7.2% | XLSX |
| Yucatán | |
|
39.6% | |
5.2% | |
-7.7% | XLSX |
| Zacatecas | |
|
41.8% | |
6.4% | |
-8.2% | XLSX |
Entidad Federativa
Resultado del Sistema de Alertas
Indicador 1
Indicador 2
Indicador 3
Información entregada por la Entidad Federativa
| Aguascalientes | |
|
19.9% | |
3.2% | |
-2.9% | XLSX |
| Baja California | |
|
38.9% | |
5.1% | |
-0.9% | XLSX |
| Baja California Sur | |
|
12.0% | |
3.0% | |
-11.8% | XLSX |
| Campeche | |
|
18.1% | |
2.6% | |
-27.3% | XLSX |
| Coahuila | |
|
90.5% | |
9.7% | |
-10.2% | XLSX |
| Colima | |
|
43.3% | |
5.6% | |
-3.9% | XLSX |
| Chiapas | |
|
38.3% | |
5.2% | |
-8.8% | XLSX |
| Chihuahua | |
|
90.5% | |
9.6% | |
0.3% | XLSX |
| Ciudad de México | |
|
37.9% | |
5.4% | |
-26.7% | XLSX |
| Durango | |
|
51.1% | |
8.5% | |
1.1% | XLSX |
| Guanajuato | |
|
20.2% | |
4.3% | |
-16.6% | XLSX |
| Guerrero | |
|
5.1% | |
1.9% | |
5.1% | XLSX |
| Hidalgo | |
|
9.5% | |
2.5% | |
-20.3% | XLSX |
| Jalisco | |
|
28.4% | |
3.9% | |
-7.5% | XLSX |
| México | |
|
27.6% | |
3.3% | |
-6.3% | XLSX |
| Michoacán | |
|
49.9% | |
5.3% | |
1.1% | XLSX |
| Morelos | |
|
36.2% | |
4.4% | |
-5.8% | XLSX |
| Nayarit | |
|
50.2% | |
6.7% | |
2.9% | XLSX |
| Nuevo León | |
|
99.9% | |
10.3% | |
3.2% | XLSX |
| Oaxaca | |
|
36.1% | |
4.9% | |
-7.8% | XLSX |
| Puebla | |
|
15.6% | |
2.9% | |
-13.5% | XLSX |
| Querétaro | |
|
5.5% | |
3.6% | |
-13.4% | XLSX |
| Quintana Roo | |
|
62.9% | |
6.9% | |
-11.6% | XLSX |
| San Luis Potosí | |
|
19.5% | |
2.8% | |
3.4% | XLSX |
| Sinaloa | |
|
17.4% | |
3.2% | |
0.5% | XLSX |
| Sonora | |
|
72.5% | |
8.5% | |
1.7% | XLSX |
| Tabasco | |
|
13.4% | |
2.5% | |
-1.4% | XLSX |
| Tamaulipas | |
|
39.3% | |
4.3% | |
-12.1% | XLSX |
| Veracruz | |
|
50.2% | |
5.7% | |
-6.4% | XLSX |
| Yucatán | |
|
38.5% | |
5.0% | |
-7.1% | XLSX |
| Zacatecas | |
|
40.9% | |
5.5% | |
-9.5% | XLSX |
Entidad Federativa
Resultado del Sistema de Alertas
Indicador 1
Indicador 2
Indicador 3
Información entregada por la Entidad Federativa
| Aguascalientes | |
|
26.6% | |
3.1% | |
-1.5% | XLSX |
| Baja California | |
|
44.0% | |
4.8% | |
4.3% | XLSX |
| Baja California Sur | |
|
18.1% | |
2.9% | |
-6.6% | XLSX |
| Campeche | |
|
18.2% | |
2.6% | |
-23.8% | XLSX |
| Coahuila | |
|
87.0% | |
8.9% | |
-6.3% | XLSX |
| Colima | |
|
46.7% | |
5.4% | |
-0.9% | XLSX |
| Chiapas | |
|
36.7% | |
4.7% | |
-6.9% | XLSX |
| Chihuahua | |
|
93.0% | |
9.1% | |
4.8% | XLSX |
| Ciudad de México | |
|
39.5% | |
5.2% | |
-17.8% | XLSX |
| Durango | |
|
59.3% | |
8.0% | |
0.3% | XLSX |
| Guanajuato | |
|
19.9% | |
4.2% | |
-15.8% | XLSX |
| Guerrero | |
|
16.4% | |
1.7% | |
10.8% | XLSX |
| Hidalgo | |
|
9.2% | |
2.2% | |
-14.0% | XLSX |
| Jalisco | |
|
28.2% | |
3.9% | |
-1.5% | XLSX |
| México | |
|
27.3% | |
3.1% | |
-4.2% | XLSX |
| Michoacán | |
|
53.1% | |
4.9% | |
5.0% | XLSX |
| Morelos | |
|
35.4% | |
4.0% | |
-1.7% | XLSX |
| Nayarit | |
|
47.7% | |
6.2% | |
4.9% | XLSX |
| Nuevo León | |
|
96.7% | |
9.3% | |
5.3% | XLSX |
| Oaxaca | |
|
36.4% | |
3.8% | |
-0.7% | XLSX |
| Puebla | |
|
12.9% | |
2.7% | |
-3.6% | XLSX |
| Querétaro | |
|
4.8% | |
3.5% | |
-6.8% | XLSX |
| Quintana Roo | |
|
62.6% | |
6.6% | |
-5.5% | XLSX |
| San Luis Potosí | |
|
25.2% | |
2.5% | |
7.5% | XLSX |
| Sinaloa | |
|
23.9% | |
3.3% | |
3.1% | XLSX |
| Sonora | |
|
75.7% | |
8.0% | |
5.4% | XLSX |
| Tabasco | |
|
16.5% | |
2.7% | |
1.5% | XLSX |
| Tamaulipas | |
|
38.2% | |
4.2% | |
-7.0% | XLSX |
| Veracruz | |
|
47.3% | |
5.1% | |
-4.3% | XLSX |
| Yucatán | |
|
37.9% | |
4.9% | |
-0.7% | XLSX |
| Zacatecas | |
|
40.3% | |
5.2% | |
-5.4% | XLSX |
Nota: Tlaxcala no es objeto de la medición del Sistema de Alertas, toda vez que no cuenta con Financiamientos y Obligaciones inscritos en el Registro Público Único.